You are currently viewing Post-Merkel Europe: A New Strategic Playbook for Brussels?

Post-Merkel Europe: A New Strategic Playbook for Brussels?

While the Bundestag’s elections are ending Merkel’s legacy, they symbolise a new era for Brussels. For 16 years, Angela Merkel’s doctrine has been defending the “European unity” and balancing the European and Atlantic security policies (Buras & Puglerin, 2021). In the wake of heated geopolitical tensions, the future Berlin’s government will be expected to take on more responsibility to defend European interests. Given the rising strategic powers of Moscow and Beijing, and the shrinking of Washington’s presence on European soil, Brussels’ shift from “the responsibility to protect” to “the responsibility to act” is needed more than ever (Puglerin, 2021). On that note, this Info Flash raises the question of whether post-Merkel’s Berlin will deepen the EU’s security role, given Germany’s culture of restraint?

Germany, historically France’s ally, has been presented as a “shirker,” a mediator between the EU and NATO, stemming from its anti-militaristic tendencies, low defence spending, and its resulting unwillingness to increase its military power (Buhary Gumez & Baris Gulmez, 2020). Since the end of the Second World War (WWII), Germany has adopted the “culture of military restraint” and the policy of “never act alone,” thus reflecting its attempts to leave behind its traumatic past (Koening, 2018). To Macron’s dissatisfaction, the country has since been acting as a “civilian power,” restraining the use of force in the international arena while propelling multilateralism (Koening, 2018).

Since 2005, Merkel has been following the mantra of “keep the Union together” (Buras & Puglerin, 2021) by bridging the internal divisions and balancing European and Atlantic security policies (Buras & Puglerin, 2021). Merkel’s defence policy is somewhat trapped between the Europeanists and Atlanticists camps. On the one hand, the chancellor has never been a fervent supporter of “hard security” (Puglerin, 2021), distancing herself from the Bundeswehr (Germany’s armed forces) and being somewhat hesitant with agreeing to military interventions. On the other hand, she has encouraged the creation of a European Defence Union and strengthening Germany’s role in NATO (Puglierin, 2021). Regardless of Merkel’s openness towards a European Strategic Autonomy, her reservations regarding defence policy have been putting the brakes on embracing the “responsibility to act” (Hasselbach, 2021). Put differently, the German Chancellor’s foreign policy has been centred around “preserving the status quo,” knowing that “Germany is too small to achieve things by itself,” yet due to its position in Europe, “it is condemned to leadership” (Hasselbach, 2021).

Nevertheless, while the three leading parties have dominated the German elections campaign, Merkel’s era is coming to its end. The front-runners to succeed Merkel are the Social Democratic Party (SPD) under Olaf Scholz, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) with Armin Laschet, replacing Merkel and the Greens under Annalena Baerbock (Knight, 2021). Apart from the leading figures, other parties such as the Free Democratic Party (FDP), the Die Linke (The Left) and the Alternative for Germany (AfD) are also in the race for chancellorship (Franke, 2021). However, as the clock is ticking away, it looks likely that the SPD will prevail over the CDU, the Greens, and the other parties (Knight, 2021). But following the rising strategic competition, what does this signal for the European security muscle?

Looking at the big picture, the three leading candidates (SPD, CDU and Greens) share the same views on Germany’s foreign and security policy, in contrast to Die Linke and AfD. Both of these parties strive for NATO’s replacement with a collective security structure, including Russia as an indispensable partner. They strongly object to any form of a European military union and military interventions, which would lead to Macron’s efforts for Strategic Autonomy to go up in smoke (Franke, 2021). On the contrary, the FDP and the SPD follow a more Europe-centred strategy, thus underpinning the idea of European sovereignty and a future defence union (Franke, 2021). Scholz advocates creating a European army and recognises the urgency for addressing the Russian danger at Europe’s borders. The politician has declared that “there will be further European integration” in security affairs that will go hand in hand with NATO’s strengthening (Franke, 2021). Notwithstanding, Scholz’s foreign policy towards the Kremlin does not stand out from Merkel’s doctrine (Gehrke, 2021).

Regarding Laschet, as Merkel’s “natural successor,” his security views lie between the chancellor’s defence reservation and Macron’s push for more European integration (Von Der Burchard, 2021). However, some critics are concerned whether Laschet will meet the world’s expectations for Germany’s tougher stance on external challenges, given he might be “the copy of Merkel’s model” (Von Der Burchard, 2021). Whereas the Greens have been traditionally pacifists in military affairs, their new policy agenda stresses the deepening of EU defence interoperability and the consolidation of the transatlantic alliance. According to Baerbock, “Europe has been revolving around itself for years,” referring to Trump’s era, Brexit, Russian and Turkish threats, and China’s rise (Brzozowski, 2021). Although the Greens favour the idea of increasing European military capabilities, they are less enthusiastic about increasing the European defence fund for military interventions, in contrast to CDU (Franke, 2021).

The shift in American strategic priorities, the so-called “rebalancing towards Asia-Pacific,” has caused considerable unease in the European continent, calling into question the credibility of Washington’s security umbrella (Biscop, 2021). For example, China’s rising military power and its annexation of the South China Sea calls for a collective European pushback and a more assertive foreign policy. However, the three leading figures, Scholz, Laschet and Baerbock, support a constructive dialogue with China, stressing its role as not only a “rival” but also a “partner” and a “competitor” (Franke, 2021).

Russia poses another security challenge to Europe’s borders. This has divided the German public on whether the country should develop closer ties with Moscow or follow a more isolated policy. The provocative Russian policy towards Eastern Europe has raised many security concerns among Europeans, especially after Trump’s administration and the Russian massing of troops on Ukraine’s borders (Biscop, 2021). Baerbock underlined that the Kremlin’s provocations are encouraged by Brussels’ and Berlin’s weak security policy. Therefore, it is crucial to take more responsibility in securing the European continent by military means (Baerbock, 2021). In the same vein, Laschet and Scholz have also adopted a cautious stance on Moscow’s foreign policy, preserving an open dialogue on economic interests (Franke, 2021).

Consequently, the party front-runners are keeping their cards close on security matters and are avoiding making public statements that might have a negative impact on the elections’ result (Puglierin, 2021). Especially, the policy of nuclear sharing remains unspoken between the SPD and the Greens, in contrast to the CDU, who openly support this long-term goal. The pacifists, the Greens, may underpin the manifesto of military force but only as an ultima ratio, namely when all other means (sanctions or embargoes) have been already exhausted (Franke, 2021).

As the world is entering a new age of strategic rivalry, Germany is expected to transit from “the responsibility to protect” to “the responsibility to act” (Franke, 2021). Considering Washington’s “pivot to Asia-Pacific” and the recent withdrawal from Kabul, Beijing’s rise, and Moscow’s aggressive policy in Eastern Europe, Berlin should engage more in defence matters by setting its security interests (Franke, 2021). Until Germany joins France to wake up the “Sleeping Beauty,” the Russian and Chinese military muscle will continue to develop, while American engagement on the European continent might slowly retreat (Tisdall, 2021). The shifting global balance and Merkel’s departure force Berlin to side less with Washington and stand up for its interests. The historic shift in Western geopolitics has already marked a new era in the multipolar world, signalling Germany to leave its comfort zone and provide more leadership in the military sector. Nevertheless, the way towards a new strategic security playbook remains to be decided upon.

Written by Olha Hunchak

 

Bibliography

Baerbock, A. (2021, May 6) In dialogue: the Transatlantic Relationship and the Green Transition. Atlantic Council. Available at: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/news/transcripts/annalena-baerbock-on-a-transatlantic-green-deal-and-german-strategies-in-facing-russia-and-china/. Accessed at: 20/09/2021

Biscop, S. (2021, August 27) EU strategy: Resolutely moderate, The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. Available at: https://hcss.nl/report/eu-strategy-resolutely-moderate/. Accessed at: 20/09/2021

Brzozowski, A. (2021, May 7) German Greens leader Baerbock signals post-pacifist shift on foreign policy, Euractiv. Available at:  https://www.euractiv.com/section/elections/news/german-greens-leader-baerbock-signals-post-pacifist-shift-on-foreign-policy/.  Accessed at: 20/09/2021 

Franke, U. (2021, September 16) Foreign and defence policy in the German election, European Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://ecfr.eu/article/foreign-and-defence-policy-in-the-german-election/. Accessed at: 16/09/2021

Gehrke, L. (2021, August 12) Germany’s Scholz call for EU Ostpolitik, Politico. Available at:

https://www.politico.eu/article/youre-so-vague-germanys-scholz-calls-for-new-russia-policy/. Accessed at: 20/09/2021

Gulmez, D.B. & Gulmez, S.B. (2020): Towards an autonomous European defense? A comparative analysis of French, Polish and German perspectives in the post-Brexit era, Global Affairs, 6(2), 185-202. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23340460.2020.1776628

Hasselbach, C. (2021, September 6) German election: What is Angela Merkle’s foreign policy legacy? Deutsche Welle. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-what-is-angela-merkels-foreign-policy-legacy/a-59043805. Accessed at: 20/09/2021.

Knight, B. (2021, September 19) German election: SPD’s Olaf Scholz wins final TV debate, Deutsche Welle. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-spds-olaf-scholz-wins-final-tv-debate/a-59234530. Accessed at: 20/09/2021.

Koening, N. (2018) Leading Beyond Civilian Power: Germany’s Role Re-conception in European Crisis Management, German Politics, 29(1), 79-96. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644008.2018.1496240

Buras, P & Puglierin, J. (2021, September 14) Beyond Merkelism: What Europeans expect of post-election Germany?European Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/beyond-merkelism-what-europeans-expect-of-post-election-germany/. Accessed at: 16/09/2021

Puglierin, J. (2021, January 15) After Merkel: why Germany must end its inertia on defence and security? European Council on Foreign Relations. Available at:  https://ecfr.eu/article/after-merkel-why-germany-must-end-its-inertia-on-defence-and-security/. Accessed at: 17/09/2021

Tisdall, S. (2021, September 5) Wanted a true leader for Europe now Merkel’s reluctant reign is over, The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/sep/05/wanted-a-true-leader-for-europe-now-merkels-reluctant-reign-is-over. Accessed at: 17/09/2021

Von Der Burchard, H. (2021, August 9) Armin Laschet wants to lead Europe. Not everyone thinks he’s up to it, Politico. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-armin-laschet-cdu-chancellor-europe-leader/. Accessed at: 20/09/2021