ReArm Europe: European Response to European Problems

Following Trump’s re-election and his statement on NATO – “if you are not going to pay your bills, we are not going to defend you” (NBC News, 2023) – along with JD Vance’s remarks at the Munich Security Conference and their tense Oval Office meeting with Zelensky, a strong response from EU countries became inevitable. The US has made it clear that NATO allies failing to meet the 2% defence spending threshold cannot expect American protection, casting doubt on the applicability of Article 5 of the Washington Treaty to certain members. This policy shift not only shakes NATO and the EU but also signals a shift in US military engagement in Europe. Washington will now decide where to plan and exercise based on defence budgets, potentially reducing or repositioning its presence on the continent (Kube, Lee, & Tskirkin, 2025).

0 Comments

The joint action of the EU and NATO in Ukraine: are we doing enough?

In February 2022, Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. This decision forced the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) to take more decisive action in supporting Ukraine’s defence of its territory. For example, many EU member states increased their defence spending and sent weaponry to Ukraine. However, the interoperability issue remains pertinent as the European Defence and Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) is structurally fragmented. Moreover, given Ukraine’s inheritance of Soviet-era weaponry, further training and logistical difficulties have arisen, posing setbacks and challenges to Ukraine’s effective defence strategies. This paper will discuss the joint action of the EU and NATO and its impact on Ukraine’s defence of its territory. The analysis will focus on the evolution of financial mechanisms and the creation of a military mission on the ground that complements nonmilitary efforts. Following this, it explores NATO’s complementary action, reinforcing cooperation with Ukraine and boosting armament in the East. Finally, the paper analyses hybrid threats in the examined case and problematises about a way forward through EU-NATO joint action.

Comments Off on The joint action of the EU and NATO in Ukraine: are we doing enough?

Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Weapons – Strategic Ethical Considerations for European Defence

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into autonomous weapons systems represents a shift into modern warfare, offering unprecedented capabilities while posing profound stra- tegic and ethical challenges. This paper explores the strategic benefits and ethical challenges associated with deploying AI-driven technologies in European defence strategies. It highlights the potential military advantages, including enhanced operational efficiency, while addressing critical ethical concerns such as accountability, decision-making in life-or-death scenarios and the risk of conflict escalation. By analysing European defence policies and international frameworks, this study offers a nuanced perspective on balancing technological innovation with ethical imperatives, ensuring stability and adherence to international humanitarian law. Through case studies of European and global approaches, this paper’s aim is to inform strategies that harmonise security objectives with moral and legal principles.

Comments Off on Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Weapons – Strategic Ethical Considerations for European Defence